Short answer
AI broker client communication drafting is a workflow where a model drafts renewal summaries, claim progress updates, policy change confirmations and disclosure reminders from the broker’s client records and insurer documents, in the adviser’s voice. The adviser checks and sends each one. In New Zealand the FAP licensee remains responsible for AI use in advice, so drafts carry no recommendations the adviser has not made.
- Drafts pull figures verbatim from schedules and insurer notices; nothing is estimated.
- Recommendations are written by the adviser, never generated.
- Client replies are screened for facts the broker must pass to the insurer.
- Disclosure wording for consumer policies changes when the Contracts of Insurance Act takes effect.
Which letters a model should draft
AI broker client communication drafting takes the letters advisers write over and over, where the facts already sit in the broking system and insurer documents, and produces a first draft in the adviser’s voice. The adviser edits, adds any advice, and sends. The letters that suit drafting are data-heavy and repetitive; the ones that do not are personal or contentious.
| Communication | Draft with AI | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Renewal summary (premium, sums insured, excess and term changes) | Yes | Figures come from two schedules |
| Pre-renewal “check your details” reminder | Yes, from an approved template | Wording must be exact |
| Claim progress update relaying the insurer | Yes | Facts come from the insurer’s message |
| Mid-term change confirmation | Yes | Facts come from the endorsement |
| Recommendation to change cover or insurer | No, adviser writes | This is advice |
| Declined claim, complaint or hardship | No, adviser writes | Judgement and care |
How the workflow runs
- Inputs
- Client and policy records from the broking system, current and previous schedules, insurer renewal notices and claim messages, the firm’s approved templates, and the adviser’s notes.
- Systems
- The broking system, Outlook or Gmail for drafts (never auto-send), a document store, and a model API on terms that exclude training on client data.
- Steps
- Select the letter type; pull figures verbatim; build a change table (last year, this year, difference); fill the approved template; write plain-language explanations only from insurer-supplied reasons; place the draft in the adviser’s mailbox; when the client replies, screen the reply for new facts about the risk.
- Human review
- The adviser reads every draft against the schedule and sends it personally. A compliance lead samples sent letters monthly and approves template changes.
- Outputs
- Drafts in the adviser’s mailbox, change tables, a flag on client replies that mention changes to the risk, and a record of who approved what.
- Measures
- Edits per draft, figure errors found before sending (target zero after send), time per renewal, and client replies flagged and passed to insurers.
- Risks
- Wrong client data, invented reasons for premium changes, implied advice, outdated legal wording, and promotional content in service letters.
The NZ rules that shape the drafts
The FMA says all advisers must follow the Code of Professional Conduct for Financial Advice Services, including treating clients fairly, acting with integrity and giving suitable advice. At an FMA workshop in April 2026 there was broad consensus that primary responsibility for AI use in financial advice rests with the FAP licensee, and in August 2026 the FMA opened an exploratory thematic review of AI in financial advice. Expect questions about how drafting tools are supervised.
The Contracts of Insurance Act 2024, which the FMA says takes effect on 15 November 2027, changes two things for brokers. For consumer policies, section 13 replaces the old disclosure duty with a duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation, so reminder templates need rewriting. Section 62 requires a broker who receives a relevant representation from a consumer client before a contract is entered into or varied to take reasonable steps to pass it on to the insurer. Screening client replies (“we’ve converted the garage into a sleepout”) for exactly that is the most valuable check in this workflow.
Illustrative example: a six-adviser Hawke’s Bay brokerage
Illustrative example, synthetic numbers: a brokerage handles 1,800 personal and commercial renewals a year (150 a month) and sends about 60 claim updates a month. Assumptions: a renewal summary takes 20 minutes by hand and 7 minutes to check and finish from a draft; a claim update takes 8 minutes by hand and 3 from a draft.
- Adviser time: 150 x 13 minutes + 60 x 5 minutes = about 37 hours a month back.
- Model fees: 210 drafts at 12,000 input and 900 output tokens on OpenAI’s gpt-6.1-sol, at US$2 and US$10 per million tokens (OpenAI, as listed on 19 October 2026), is about US$7 a month.
What stays with the adviser
Advisers write every recommendation, decide what to tell a client about cover gaps, handle complaints and declined claims, and pass client information to insurers. They send every letter themselves. The model never emails clients directly.
Where drafting goes wrong
- Invented reasons. “Your premium rose because of recent weather events” when the insurer gave no reason. Explanations must quote the insurer’s notice or be left for the adviser.
- Wrong client. A merge pulls another client’s schedule. Show the client name and policy number at the top of every draft for a final check.
- Advice creep. “You may want to consider increasing your sum insured” is a recommendation. Block advisory phrasing in templates and let the adviser add it.
- Marketing creep. The Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 bars unsolicited commercial messages; keep promotions out of service letters.
Our lesson on drafting emails with human review covers the approval habit, and the Microsoft 365 guide covers drafting into Outlook. Related workflows are policy document comparison support and claims document triage. We build these as AI workflow automation; see the insurance overview.
Sources
- What to expect from your financial adviser, Financial Markets Authority, updated 24 May 2021
- Thematic review on artificial intelligence in financial advice: engagement overview, Financial Markets Authority, 2026
- Thematic review: AI in financial advice, Financial Markets Authority, accessed 19 October 2026
- Contracts of Insurance Act 2024, New Zealand Legislation, accessed 19 October 2026
- FMA letter to insurers outlining expectations regarding Contracts of Insurance Act, Financial Markets Authority, updated 18 May 2026
- Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007, New Zealand Legislation, accessed 19 October 2026
- API pricing, OpenAI, accessed 19 October 2026
Written by the Levy Street team in Wellington. Last updated 19 October 2026.